Bong Lover said:
Anyhow, you're assertion was that there mere fact that Microsoft didn't boast of their specs was proof that their console is weaker. 'The mere fact' means that that fact and that fact alone is enough to prove your conclusion. Wich is a logical error as already pointed out. Even if you had brought in all these other references to your argument that you are talking about, your assertion would still be logically invalid and nothing would have changed. Again, by adding to your analogy you have done nothing to correct the logical error in the reasoning. I have come to the conclusion that you don't understand formal logic, have no intention of applying the rules of logic to your arguments and fail to see the benefit of clear logical reasoning even in informal arguments. It's with a certain degree of sadness I conclude that my efforts over the past two days have yielded zero results and that my dream of this place fostering at least a somewhat rational debate is none the closer. Thank you for your time. |
You're impossible. This is a forum, not a science report. I was right, and you're mad about it. How I came to the the conclusion is obviosuly irrelevant to you. You are obssessed with this notion of the definition of "logic" is. Here's the thing, its irrelevant to the discussion. It's called goal post moving.You can't handle someone bring right so you go on this quest to prove that my comment isn't logical.
If it makes it makes you happy, I'll admit it. I'm not logical. I was right though and I'm sorry if that ruffles your feathers.







