| VGKing said: This is getting annoying. You're implying that my whole argument was based on If A Then B; B, => AIt's not. I didn't think I needed to clarify this. I explained in my previous comments exactly how I came to my conclusion and the comment you're obsessing about is only one of the many points that led me to most logical conclusion. Going by to my previous analogy, further investiation finds that the husband has a history of violent behavior and multiple arrests. |
At least we agree on something, as this is indeed getting annoying, I am not sure we agree on when it got annoying though.
Anyhow, you're assertion was that there mere fact that Microsoft didn't boast of their specs was proof that their console is weaker. 'The mere fact' means that that fact and that fact alone is enough to prove your conclusion. Wich is a logical error as already pointed out. Even if you had brought in all these other references to your argument that you are talking about, your assertion would still be logically invalid and nothing would have changed.
Again, by adding to your analogy you have done nothing to correct the logical error in the reasoning. I have come to the conclusion that you don't understand formal logic, have no intention of applying the rules of logic to your arguments and fail to see the benefit of clear logical reasoning even in informal arguments. It's with a certain degree of sadness I conclude that my efforts over the past two days have yielded zero results and that my dream of this place fostering at least a somewhat rational debate is none the closer.
Thank you for your time.
