Michael-5 said:
Kasz216 said:
Michael-5 said:
Oh, I see, so Sony would still have complete control in decisions made by their entertainment buisness, but they have immediate cash now for PS4 dev.
However if their entertainment division is the most profitable, wouldn't 20-40% of future profits be given to new partial owners? This seems like a short term benefit, but a long term hinerance (unless PS4 really takes off because of it).
Still, Microsofts stock did fall by 0.7% or so right? How small is Microsoft's Gaming Division to their Windows Division? I think there was a small drop on MS, and a small boost to Sony because of X-Box One, but like Talal said, there is no way to know for sure.
|
Not at all.
I mean think about it. Do Sony's stockholders now get a percentage of Sony's profits? Only when the company decides to pay a divdend... and even then it's far smaller then the percentage of profit the Sony made.
The New owners would only get money from profits whenever the board of Sony Entertainment decided to pay out dividends. A board that would be dominated by Sony Executives because Sony would still own majority control.
So why would people buy? Because Sony Entertainment is hugely profitable, so you could expect their stock to climb.
It's like Berskshire Hathoway. They don't pay a dividend at all, yet their investors are more then happy to buy, because the value of their stock increases... so when they sell, they'll realize huge profits. Meanwhile Warren Buffet gets to keep all of the profits inside the company which they use to buy other companies. (Replace by other companies with expand operations, R&D etc. Stuff sony does.)
In general diverse companies are at a discount because they are more complicated... and therefore a certain level of uncertainty depresses their stock price. So a spinoff could be expected to raise both companies stock. (Hence why the stock boosted, despite it being on news sony might be getting rid of one of it's best pieces.)
The Downside is that Sony won't be able to use SCE to mask Entertainments awful performance as much... and it won't easy to shift Sony Entertainment money to Sony Electronics stuff since they will be essentially different companies.
Ironically people on the chartz seem to have this backwords. If you have faith in Sony... and that they can turn their electronics division around you should be FOR the spinoff. If you think Sony electronics is going to flounder for a long time or is ultimatly doomed, you would want to be against the spinoff so sony has more coverage while their electronics division shrinks and they try and expand other buisnesses.
|
Sony Stockholders have the option to sell when Sony gets richer, but I see what you're saying. Still it seems like a bit of an almost last resort to getting some money.
I hope Sony can use this extra income and turn around their entertainment division, If Sony stops making TV's, who can guarentee that they will be around much longer to make games? Last I checked Sony's console profits are not the same as Nintendo's, or even Microsofts (for the last gen only), so it would be good that Sony have extra money to fall back on in case they hit another slump.
|
Oh i doubt Sony will actually do it. Though they are discussing it showing some dissention from what Kaz wants.
Sony is a very oldschool Japanese company. So they're really unlikely to split up.
A lot of Japanese companies seem like they do 15 things that aren't even remotely related.
If you don't have a bunch of different buisnesses you can't have senior management compete to see who gets promoted to big boss. (Though the western perspective would argue that this produces Ceo's who are too focused on "where they came from" and makes company policy untargeted as certain areas go ignored.)
