Max King of the Wild said:
My language skills are good enough to get me scholarships to a prestigous university to major in biochem and molecular bio and minor in philoosophy. When I don't give a shit in pursuing a conversation with someone because they show they can't follow a simple conversation I will resort to ad hominems because frankly I don't give a shit and you haven't pointed out any fallacies because there hasn't been any straw man here. |
Well if you're going to take that route (to be clear, the immodest, high-atop-my-mountain route), then I've been studying mathematics and computer science for the past four years (with shitloads of scholarships, I might add), so there is nothing wrong with my logic. Have you ever had to carry out a proof in an advanced analysis course? Or abstract algebra? Have you ever even been exposed to a semi-rigorous number theory course? If you had, then you'd understand the level of logic one needs to posess to move forward in mathematics. Once again, you have absolutely no solid ground (hell, you can't even claim to have a liquid sea!) atop which you can insult my logic from.
And you're right, I haven't been able to follow the conversation with you. Because, like I said, you are bad at expressing your thoughts in a concise (or even gramatically correct) way. So that's hardly my fault; in fact, it's not my fault at all.








