By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chapset said:
Mr Khan said:
chapset said:
TripleMMM said:
fillet said:

Except Most Wanted U is only ever so slightly better looking on the Wii-U.

Like some multiplats look ever so slightly better on the Xbox 360 vs PS3. It's well known the PS3 produces the best graphical exclusives. The "Most Wanted situation" isn't substantial proof of anything, just generally that it's in the same ball park area of power as an Xbox 360 or PS3. You show a game with substantially improved textures, particle effects, resolution and physics effects Vs the PS3/Xbox 360 version then people start becoming believers.

If that doesn't make you believe, then I don't know what will, but if you want to have more proof, then we just have to play the waiting game and see if (and that's a big IF) other developers wants to do the grunt work... But I gotta say, if Criterion can do that with a flip of a switch, imagine what they could've done if they actually did the game really from the ground-up? But that is also still up for debate... >.>

with how much the game sold don't get your hopes up for third parties to do that

Given that EA sent it out to die like everything else, sales are no excuse.

By making it the superior version??


Well NFS I think did bad for two reasons:
1. Price difference was huge, it is like a kick in the balls.

2. All the EA BS that went down with previous games and their PR was enough for people to say fuck all EA games.

 

Which is sad cause NFS is pretty good.