By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I think that Ubisoft (and Warner) are more pragmatic than EA. The question is actually very simple: Do we make money from our WiiU games?

If the answer is YES, then the logical thing to do is continue making games for it until the situation changes, if it changes.

If the answer is NO, then they have to ask themselves: Can this situation change in the future? Is it ok if we risk our relationship with them by not launching our games on the console?

Apparently Warner makes money, otherwise they wouldn't make Scribblenauts, so they will keep releasing games until the situation changes.

Ubisoft either makes money or isn't ready to lose Nintendo as one of their targets, so they have decided to keep launching games. And given that they have announced that both Watch Dogs and Splinter Cell, games that no one said would appear on WiiU, will in fact be launched on the console then we can assume that it's not only that they don't want to lose Nintendo but also that they expect to win money.

And then there is EA, which doesn't make money and doesn't care about losing Nintendo paltforms. We can like it or not, but if they don't make money from their WiiU games then it's not a bad idea to stop supporting the console. But while that is acceptable and understable, talking trash about the console for no rason isn't.

What one has to think about is, why are Ubi, Warner and other making money from their games on Nintendo consoles while EA doesn't?



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.