think-man said:
Nem said:
think-man said:
Will I get banned if I say I kinda agree with him? |
If you like beeing wrong, go right ahead. :P
edit: i see you replied to the other guy and specified what you mean. It isnt right aswell. Ubi soft managed to make good money, SEGA manages to make good money. You need to know the audience and what kind of product works. You cant just shove anything in there and expect it to be a sucess. Thats what marketing is for (product) and if 3rd parties cant sell their games its because their marketing sucks. Companies go after costumers, not the other way around (though some are that faithful).
The thing is that in a hardcore audience, almost anything sells if you advertise enough, no matter how crap it is.
|
Yeah I don't no the in's and outs but I tend to see alot of threads with companies opting not to bring their games to the WiiU, so I kinda concluded they aren't making enough money to justify bringing it to the console. I know there are some good 3rd party companies like ubisoft that are supporting the WiiU (even the vita) with games but they are a minority.
|
Thats your hint as to wich companies have good marketing and product development and wich ones dont.
The userbase of a Nintendo console is more family friendly. If you put a Call of Duty HARDCORE AWESOME HEADSHOT, its probably not gonna sell that well. Now, if you release Skylanders touch and go, suddenly you have a sucessful product. Apparantly EA is so incompetent they cant see that.
Ubisoft games are generally more familly acceptable than EA ones. Mainly because EA favors shooters, and those dont do well on a family envyronment. Platformers and Action adventure are always gonna do better on Nintendo systems. EA uses the recipe of Shooter = million seller and then they QQ when their magic formula doesnt get eaten up by regular families.
Essay Pro