By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JayWood2010 said:
Talal said:
JayWood2010 said:
Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:
Did I not say that this thread would turn out bad XD

And for the people responding to me about 6 games vs 3 or whatever, I am saying Halo sold more games this gen.

Halo averaged over 6m a year through 6 years and GT averaged over 3m in 5 years. That is what I was saying.


The problem with the post would be that it had nothing to do with the topic at hand. The topic was about Halo Reach and Gran Turismo 5, with the possiblity of GT5 "reaching" Halo 3.

You completely ignored the OP. You didnt discuss anything in the OP. You compared the franchises as a whole. Comparing the entire franchises for the generation was pointless. It was pure deflection. It was pure damage control. It was purely off topic.

That was/is the problem people had with it.


Let's be honest about things.  This thread was a bad idea.  Go ahead and ignore my comparison  as well as the other 20 comparisons in this thread.  No big deal.

The only reason to put GT vs Halo is to get a rise out of people.


Why is it a bad idea? Because this particular Halo title didn't "win"?

No lol  First off tell me why Halo and GT is pitted against one another?  Be honest here.

Also tell me why he chooses a game that isn't the top selling Halo?  It would be a little more news worthy if it was  Halo 3



1- Because both are huge exclusives for Sony and Microsoft. Both pull similarly big numbers.

2- He chose Reach because it's a closer comparison. Closer in release date and closer in number. It would be more news worthy if it passed Halo3 true. Then again I remember your thread about Halo 4 reaching 8 mills, it would have been more news worthy if it reached Black Ops 2 sales.