badgenome said:
"You have to remember," Mr. Lorenzi elaborates, "that in 2001, hijacking an airplane didn't mean the same thing as it did after September 11. At the time, it implied forcing a plane to land at an airport to conduct negotiations. We were used to dealing with that." Besides that, is it really reasonable to compare protecting one singular consulate that was known to have security concerns with keeping every single flight from being hijacked? |
So both times the CIA didn't anticipate how large scale the attacks would be.
I don't even know why we are still arguing. None of what was accused was proven by the email releases.
It's only an issue because Hilary is a contender for next election race. That's really the only reason it's being brought up again.
That and to continue stalling on passing laws. This is just another version of a philibuster.
