Ckmlb1 on 15 May 2013
| theprof00 said: Just because a person comes forward and says they killed someone, it doesn't mean they did. A confessed murderer still has an investigation to find evidence proving his guilt. In the same vein, who was to say that it was a terrorist attack definitively? It looks to me like they looked at the evidence, made doubly sure that the evidence was concrete, and did an investigation....and meanwhile saying, 'we think it's an attack but, well, there's a lot of variables. We think it could also just be part of this protest and terrorists are taking credit for it, we just don't know. We'll have to investigate to make sure everything is 100% accurate' |
This is pretty much what I believe except replace attack with 'whether it was Al Qaeda attack or someone else attacking'.
XBL Gamertag: ckmlb, PSN ID: ckmlb
