By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
Ckmlb1 said:

Connecting the dots like you did based on Morrell deciding to strike the lines about Al Qaeda out, assuming that they were unsure :)

Well, leaving the talking points aside for a moment, Obama himself was briefed on al-Qaeda involvement after the attack yet continued to flog that YouTube video for weeks. So even if there was a pure motive for editing the talking points in such a way (unlikely), there is no excuse for that.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/15/benghazi-emails-released-white-house

 

Excerpt: 

The series of email exchanges reveal that the vital phrase "with ties to al-Qaida" was later excised.    

The White House said this was done at the request of the CIA and not the White House and that the emails support this, showing that a CIA analyst said there was no intelligence at that point to support the assertion of al-Qaida involvement.

In an email from the CIA three days after the attack, it noted the reference to al-Qaida, suggesting it was complicit in the deaths of the four Americans, and a CIA analyst says: "Do we know this?"

 

There's the CIA doubt again. 



XBL Gamertag: ckmlb, PSN ID: ckmlb