Vertigo-X on 15 May 2013
| Mr Khan said: Let us consider the alternative: don't pay for the children, then they end up yet more disadvantaged than they probably already are, and will likely do more long-term damage to society and the taxpayer than paying for them now, growing up to have health problems or more likely to be criminals. Aside from which, this lady is clearly an edge case (15 kids, at all, is an edge case) and so not indicative of the average welfare consumer, thereby providing no argument of consequence. |
Easy, then: take her kids away from her. She's demonstrated a gross lack of responsibility herself and we don't want her imparting that to those children.
The BuShA owns all!
