| Mr Khan said: Let us consider the alternative: don't pay for the children, then they end up yet more disadvantaged than they probably already are, and will likely do more long-term damage to society and the taxpayer than paying for them now, growing up to have health problems or more likely to be criminals. Aside from which, this lady is clearly an edge case (15 kids, at all, is an edge case) and so not indicative of the average welfare consumer, thereby providing no argument of consequence. |
What do we do with stray or wild dogs and cats?
We castrate them of course, but we also put them down, for the most part it seems to work, so why not something similar?
There's 'alternative' option one can consider, it may be crazy, but sometimes we need a little crazy.
--- --- ----
On a more serious note, this reminds me of the movie 'idiocracy'. Good movie if you haven't watched it.
The key problem I see is as follows:-
-We don’t support these people and their kids, Result: possible increase in criminal activity and a nuisance to society, thus affecting the tax payers in one way or another.
-We support these people and their kids, Result: reduced possibility of being criminals, but an increased dependency on the state creating welfare dependant families, if welfare stops, then as above.
In all honesty, it looks like tax payers money goes to welfare in order to bribe these people from being a nuisance, what is comes down to is this, your fucked if you do, your fucked if you don’t.
The key thing is we need to stop these types of people from breeding, we need tax payer/workers to breed, these are the types of people we want and who should be having more children with state support, keep in mind that working people on average have less children that these people like the one in the video. I’m sorry, we need to start thinking like farmers, we need to breed the right cattle so to speak if we are to become a better nation and not a nation that follows the path of the movie Idiocracy.
I’m not advocating death of anyone, simply the temporary sterility of these people, once they are financially capable of supporting themselves and a child, they will gain the right to breed, those that don’t, they’ll continue their lives as normal. But guess what, the vicious circle has now been broken.
I know that the above is not politically correct, and one could even say taboo, but their needs to be change, this PC pussy footing around has got us into this situation, and we need people with balls to start change, if China has the balls to pull off a one child policy then I’m sure what I suggested can be pulled off allot easier.
Oh I know I will get hate for this, and I know these right activities will come out crying, but they can shove it, they can complain all they want but I don’t see them coming up with any practical solution. It’s starting to reach a point where the young workforce can barely support the retired workforce without having also to support able body bludgers, I think it’s time we fenced breeding behind a license like we have for drinking alcohol, driving a car, and voting. Sure it’s drastic, but after 7 billion humans, I don’t think our specious is going extinct anytime soon, so why not put a red ribbon on a cut-off point and call it a day.
