By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 15 May 2013
Edit Thread
theprof00 said:
Kasz216 said:
theprof00 said:

The government performs millions of actions everyday. Why would we assume that obama is specifically tied to them?
In massachusetts there was a scandal with one of the higher ups involved withcases where drugs were tested and thousands of criminals got retrials or were let go. Should we blame him for it becayse his friend is the governor?

Because they're very specific actions that the government should have things in place to detect.


As for the bolded... it's written sort of incoherently so i don't understand what your saying.

 

It sounds like a higher up government official was faking drug tests and was found out... and that said official was a friend of the govonor... but you wordered it the other way in the last sentence so i'm not 100% sure.


If that is the case... hell yeah you should blame the governor... espiecally if he apointed him there.  That's a big problem in his administration he clearly didn't have the right people in place to do the job.

1. I meant should we blame Obama.
2. How are you supposed to hold the governor responsible, when this official was clearly lying to everyone and hiding results? What are you supposed to do?

Case in point: the marathon bombers, hell, ANY criminal doing morally reprehensible deeds. The guy who kidnapped 2 girls for 8 years, etc etc. You know the one thing everyone always says? "I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS TRUE. HE WAS SUCH A GREAT PERSON, I NEVER WOULD HAVE THOUGHT IN A MILLION YEARS THAT HE WOULD X"
Should we hold all these people in contempt because they didn't know they were being very thoroughly lied to?
How are you supposed to check people out when everything they do is strategically planned out to keep anyone else from finding out?

If a cop one day sees a criminal with a gun, and tells him to drop is, and he does, and the cop decides "oh I'll just shoot him anyway", how the fuck are we supposed to know that this cop thought this? How are we supposed to screen cops that could potentially think this?

Again, it's a big fucking distraction. Distraction after distraction.

This three headed dragon is important? Sure it is. Let's fix the problem. It won't be that easy, I guarantee it. This will be talked about for the next three years. We will spend months upon months on legislation to fix this...for what? Because someone was doing something wrong and covering up all their tracks and we didn't predict that said person would do something like that? Fucking Obama, am I right? Fuck that guy.


1) Why would you blame Obama for a State government issue.  Obama doesn't pick the govonor.

2)  Maybe the govonor should have procedures so that one single person can't just lie and get away with it?  Some checks and balances maybe?   Pretty big fucking deal that there was no way to appeal DNA tests... i mean these people KNEW they weren't fucking guilty, and weren't allowed have an independent lab check their DNA?  Maybe they should use two experts one government and one private?  Or even just two different government agencies?

3) Actually there are plenty of people to blame int those kidnapping cases.  Since neighbors saw the women... and reported nothing because they just wrote it off as domestic abuse.

Which, fuck those people.  Those people deserve to have the media critisize the fuck out of them and it's sad that it hasn't already happened.

4)  Cops very much should be screened for these things... and should be taught training methods.  One or two slip through sure... however when it's a fucking huge deal like the ones mentioned, like say in Las Vegas where the cops seem to be shooting the shit out of EVERYBODY.   Yeah.... the govonor should catch some flack I think.