By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Player1x3 said:
Mr Khan said:
Let us consider the alternative: don't pay for the children, then they end up yet more disadvantaged than they probably already are, and will likely do more long-term damage to society and the taxpayer than paying for them now, growing up to have health problems or more likely to be criminals.

Aside from which, this lady is clearly an edge case (15 kids, at all, is an edge case) and so not indicative of the average welfare consumer, thereby providing no argument of consequence.

Them 15 kids will end up like their mom and dad(s)...and the cycle will continiue. Imagine each of these kids having, lets not say 15, but 7 children. That is 105 kids, and if those kids end up having 5 kids etc etc...we must pull thiis flawed system from its root

By doing what, precisely?



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.