Mr Khan on 15 May 2013
Let us consider the alternative: don't pay for the children, then they end up yet more disadvantaged than they probably already are, and will likely do more long-term damage to society and the taxpayer than paying for them now, growing up to have health problems or more likely to be criminals.
Aside from which, this lady is clearly an edge case (15 kids, at all, is an edge case) and so not indicative of the average welfare consumer, thereby providing no argument of consequence.
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
