People or Religion, who corrupts who?

[DaRev]

dsgrue3 said:

DaRev said:

I don't know what school you when to but its obvious they feed you heaps of bullshit, and you've surrounded yourself with monkey-like friends. You come here spewing garbage like its fact because someone crammed it into you monkey-like brain. You now don't know the difference between FACT or theory, or a even straight up bullshit.

fact  

/fakt/

Noun

1. A thing that is indisputably the case.

When you use terms such as "like" or "may be" that proves you only basing you arguments on a theory. You want to believe you that LIKELY evolved from what MIGHT have been a monkey, then you go right ahead. Just don't go around presenting it like its some FACT.

Fact, humans nor any creature on earth evolves, they reproduce. They fuck and make more, FACT. Can you prove Evolution?

I thought about monkey-like friends/brain and realized it actually isn't an insult at all due to evolution. It is not a false statement.

Couple things you're still clueless about.

Humans ARE primates. Do you realize this? 

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/476264/primate

Of course we evolved. There aren't even any competing scientific theories to evolution - that's how convinced the scientific community is of its merit.

I suppose all these fossils of early hominids are all bullshit, eh?

 

Homo – immediate ancestors of modern humans

Homo gautengensis†

Homo rudolfensis†

Homo habilis†

Homo floresiensis†

Homo erectus†

Homo ergaster†

Homo antecessor†

Homo heidelbergensis†

Homo cepranensis†

Denisovans (scientific name has not yet been assigned)†

Homo neanderthalensis†

Homo rhodesiensis†

Homo sapiens

Homo sapiens idaltu†

Archaic Homo sapiens (Cro-magnon)†

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae

Just made them all up out of thin air? In Hollywood maybe? 

Lol. It's just sad that you aren't aware of these things. 

scientific theory -  systematic ideational structure of broad scope, conceived by the human imagination, that encompasses a family of empirical (experiential) laws regarding regularities existing in objects and events, both observed and posited. A scientific theory is a structure suggested by these laws and is devised to explain them in a scientifically rational manner.

That should resolve your petty dispute of the term theory. 

 

Pal, for a seemingly smart dude you really seem really blinded, and we’re already established that you’re one-side, so I should be surprised. I mean can you not see the flaws in your arguments, by simply looking at the definition you posted, which exists in bubble. That definition means nothing to anyone that is not a scientific person – i.e. it is biased, subjective and one-sided, like your thinking.

Words like “conceived” “imagination” “devised” “scientifically” mean almost nothing in a factual context, and especially to religious people. It’s like scientists that “devised” years ago that the atom was the smallest particle, but years later found out it was not. Science is only based on what you can prod in the here and now, and what you can’t prod now is not fact but is in fact just theory.

Here is another word “assume” – which is a bit unscientific I know, but it fits in with your type of reasoning. For you can only assume evolution is fact, not matter how much you try to use words like “conceived” “imagination” “devised” “scientifically”, it still all boils down to an assumption, whether scientific or otherwise. What is not an assumption and is in no way just “conceived” “imagination” “devised” “scientifically” is human reproduction – Humans make Humans – Evolution doesn’t make Humans. For when a black man fucks a white woman, and a brown baby comes out, those subtle changes are not evolution. They are code that has been put there by a creator. People didn’t evolve into some white and some black, and some fat and some skinny and all the subtle little changes that make up the human race. So why do prod little butterflies for changes and when you find the same subtleties you think its evolution? It has all been coded into what makes us human.