By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
ironmanDX said:
chapset said:
Porcupine_I said:
chapset said:
An other case were a good guy with a gun could have saved the day

Exactly! Just like a good guy with a bomb in Boston!

I see we got a smart man over the internet, some pussy tree hugers were mad at me when I said that in the thread about the boston bombing

He's not wrong. Where was your white armoured gunman? Nowhere. Shooting before that? Before that? It isn't a movie where the hero shows up at the perfect time to save the day. Real people, including wemon and children are dying. They don't get another chance to star in another shooting every other week.



Except... there have been plenty of shootings that have been stopped by people with guns.  They just generally aren't national news stories.... because the gunman is killed before it gets to the Mass murder stage.


Is there a figure? A percentage? If guns were controlled better there wouldn't be a need. Read curls post about us here in Australia. Sure, you can argue some points but no mass shooting in 17 years? That's numbers you can't argue with. Especially considering we did have a shooting nearly every year before that. The USA need to wake up. Laws that apply to people one year, or century can easily be outdated.