I blame VGChartz: the fake accuracy accusation

[tarheel91]

Faxanadu said:

ioi said:
For those who were actually here when vgchartz first began you will remember that all numbers were rounded to the nearest 250 for the very reason listed here but everyone complained and I changed it a few months later.

I am kinda 50/50 on the issue but the way it is at the moment seems to work best and keeps most people happy...

Thanks ioi for clearing that up. I guess there is a difference between the few who understand and the many that want to be deceived.

If this fake accuracy makes the users happy, keep it. 

You are confusing two very different things: preciseness and accuracy.  Preciseness has to do with how detailed a number is, or the number of signficant digits.  You are complaining about preciseness, but then relating it to accuracy?  You're not making much sense.  Rounding would actually make it less precise, that's it.  It wouldn't affect accuracy at all.