Zappykins said:
Actually, there was very very little investigation. And we will never know what the dude sitting in the White House said: "Tuesday 27 April 2004 Washington (Reuters) - The White House said on Tuesday it would not allow any recordings or transcripts of private testimony this week by President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney to the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks" http://archive.truthout.org/article/iron-curtain-secrecy-cheney-leads-bush-911-hearing A court WITHOUT transcrips? If you go to small claims there are transcrips- and they become public record. Why is that more imporant than a huge natual security failure that killed close to 3000 people? Please explain why aren't you concered about that? Even if they aren't released for the 60 years or so they have for sensitive doucments, they should be public records. |
amen bro. they walked in and saw what really happen and new damn well if what they saw got out the tremendous backlashed there would have been around the world.
scat watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=m4Lrr3TuFR8