By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 said:
JakDaSnack said:
dsgrue3 said:
JakDaSnack said:
dsgrue3 said:
JakDaSnack said:

That's where I thought you got it from, and though I gave a horrible shotput example, the universe wouldn't be nothing if the newtonian gravitational energy is zero, it would still contain enormous amount of dark matter, stars, planets, dust etc.  In other words, the universe wouldn't reduce to nothing.

Newtonian gravity is classical physics. You are about a decade behind and I implore you to continue reading about quantum physics which will replace classical gravity with its own derivation when possible. 

I think I will trust the physicists on this one, but if you disagree their work is available. Good luck disproving them. 

lol, Krauss' theory has already been disproven, but ok.

Source?

EDIT: Back to the aforementioned link, graviational energy would be the negative to all matter, not zero.

Why do I need a source, his definition of nothing isn't actually nothing.  http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nothing

This is what happens when you attempt to teach something to people devoted to nescience. And people wonder why I get upset.

See ya, kiddo 

name calling lol, good thing this argument is over, I hate dealing with people as immature as you.



Something...Something...Games...Something