Jay520 said:
Anyway, this is easy. Sure, you can call it absurd that something can create itself. Fine, I wouldn't argue with it. BUT religion claims the same thing - God created itself too! At this point the two are on equal ground. You can't say either is more absurd because both make the claim that an entity can create itself. The thing that makes religion worse is the fact that it assumes an extra entity. The other one does not. Here, let me map out the assumptions for you. Theory A: Theory B: Both A & B make some bold assumptions. But which is the bigger assumption*? Hmm..... *Hint: It's the one that makes more assumptions |
No not really. The Universe obeys by its own laws. Just like the figures in the drawing do. No where in the known Universe do we see examples of creation out of wholly nothing. It has laws. Just like the figures in the drawing couldnt suddenly become 3 dimensional beings or jump out of the paper. One law we observe in the universe is matter is pretty much a constant and cant just self create itself.
A God however would exist outside of the Universe and wouldnt have to obey by its laws. Just like you yourself can be 3 dimensional and capable of things your 2 dimensional drawings could never imagine as being real. The belief the Universe created itself also hinges on the belief that from chaos naturally things gain order, another non observable trait that defies known science and logic.