Soleron said:
you're not allowed to multiply or divide equations by x without handling the fact you just added/removed a solution. In this case the second negative solution is an artifact because you multiplied by x. This happens all the time in real physics problems and you can just ignore the other solution. There is a more formal way to deal with it in pure maths but I'm not practiced with it. |
Right, but this isn't an equation which is my point. It's a declaration of a variable. There is no equation in the OP or my post which is why this type of "proof" is bunk.







