Capcom: “We’ve Got no Plans for a PS Vita Monster Hunter at the Moment”

[Scisca]

Demensha said:

Scisca said:

ironmanDX said:

Scisca said:

ironmanDX said:

Scisca said:
As long as crapcom keeps ignoring Vita, I'm going to ignore crapcom. Personally, I don't really care about MH.

Lol, didn't have to look far after all.

Yeah, you could try to read my whole post and see that I do care about RE: R. Don't try so hard to be such a smarta$$, cause you obviously can't do it and just humiliate yourself.

I did read it all. Why not by console Resident Evil games hmm? The idea of not buying Capcom games just because MH didn't release on the Vita is stupid. That would act as more of a deterrent if anything. The more games they sell, the more they will release. The more they release on the Vita, the more Vita's get sold, the more games they sell again in turn to release more.

As long as they keep their biggest guns off of Vita, they won't get a single penny from me.

If you think that boycotting them will work though, by all means.... It hasn't worked so far, has it.

Cause what kind of a boycott would it be, if I was buying their games? And no, it's not just because MH didn't release on Vita. It's because they didn't release MH, RE and most probably won't release their next games as well. They stopped releasing games on Vita, so I have no idea what you're talking about. What games should they sell more? What profit should they make on Vita? There are no games, everything is coming to other platforms. I don't like that conduct, so I stop supporting this company. If more people do that, the CEO will eventually get fired (the sooner the better) and a new one may green light some Vita projects. Boycotting has worked so far - there will be no more stupid DmC, right? Instead of giving my money to a company ignoring my favourite platform, I give that money to companies that support it - can't see anything stupid about it.

So you don't approve of that conduct? Which conduct is that? the one that does not release games on the vita or the company that chooses not to release games on all devices. I have a funny feeling you approve of third party companies shafting nintendos home console.

Of not releasing games at all on Vita. They release multiplats on all other platforms, just ignore Vita.

I can see a reason why companies don't release multiplatform games on singnifantly inferior consoles with different architectures (was the case with Wii, isn't the case with Wii U right now, but will be once PS4/X720 enter the market) in which the manufacturer has pretty much killed their target core market. Not releasing multiplats in this case doesn't equal to outright ignoring a platform - just to make it clear. crapcom is doing just that right now. I don't own a Wii U and I'm not interested at all in buying it until it drops to 150 Euro, but I'm fairly certain that it will do well starting this Christmas, no matter what 3rd parties do. It's a Nintendo 1st party console to me anyway, I won't be interested in multiplats on Wii U, won't buy a single one, just like I didn't buy a single multiplat on the Wii - I'll buy it just to play Zelda, Metroid, Mario Kart, ZombiU, etc. I think that there will be a decent number of 3rd parties that will release multiplat or even exclusive games on Wii U anyway, cause they won't be able to afford the jump to next gen.

Nintendo decided to bring such fate upon itself by releasing such underpowered hardware. They follow their own path and have to bear all the consequences. The Vita is a different case, cause you can't argue there are any technical reasons why a game can be on 3DS, but can't be made on Vita. You also can't say that the Vita gamer isn't interested in games like RE or MH. I don't expect exclusive games, but I do demand multiplats, especially if they release a game on every single other platform on the market.