BasilZero said:
Booyah said:
BasilZero said:
Correction: Final Fantasy will be on future Nintendo handhelds just like they have been in the past (there's been at least one title on each system even the GB/C).
Monster Hunter is only on PSP as far as Sony handhelds go and I wouldnt be surprised if Capcom doesnt release/make one for the Vita. Like people have said why make a new version or port over to a system with a small userbase. Capcom's going to go to where the money is gonna be made and stay in one place. Squareenix will do the same but I think its possible a FF title can still be made on the Vita (oh wait FFX is coming out on the Vita as well nvm).
|
N64 didn't get a Final Fantasy game, and Nintendo haven't gotten any of the "main" franchise since the SNES era. If Capcom made as many monster hunter games as Square made Final Fantasy games then there would be enough spin-offs to fit on every system.
I was just addressing the issue that being mad at Capcom for this move but being ok with Square is a double standard. And if they do start putting games on Vita, maybe we should allow them time to actually make games before we crucify them?
|
Notice I said Nintendo Handhelds...I dont think the Nintendo 64 is a handheld.
Its pretty obvious that both Squareenix and Capcom are the eastern equivalent to EA so I'm pretty sure any mistake be it little or big is enough of a reason to bash them especially with all the stuff they did recently l0l.
|
Sorry, I just misread when you said every system had a FF game.
I don't have a problem with what either company has done regarding FF (besides the slide in quality for the games) or Monster Hunter. I just think its funny the double standard that people have sometimes.
