superchunk said:
2. His positions on the war, healthcare, and other items (if you want details go to his website) are much better than anyone in the Republican camp and mostly better than Clinton's. Hell, he is the only one who like me knew Iraq war was unjustified and should never had been waged. 3. What does political experience get you? Corrupted. The fact that he has not been a typical capital hill cronny is a good thing. Change is far greater with him than anyone else put forth.
|
I just wanted to that Hillary's and Obama's voting record on the war are very similiar after the intial authorization. Obama did not vote on the war was not privy to information shown to congress men and senators at the time and was not privy to information that Hillary most likely was. rememebr in the late 90's when Bill Clinton was going to attack Iraq. that said 23 senators out of which only 1 republican voted against the war.
Barrack Obama still has his corruptions either accused or not. First he has voted for stuff and than gone abck and said I woudln't have voted for it because....... Also the whole slum lord thing.
Every 4 years you have a politician calling for change and every 4 years they never do it. If you are going to vote why don't you actually look at the records of the people of the people you vote for. I don't like the fact that Obama has so many Not Voted. However I will still vote for him if he is nominated. As I thik either Clinton or Obama woudl do a good job.
Finally my biggest concern is Obama being able to handle a smeared full campaign and it will come and he is untested may be he will do good maybe not. I don't know. But the man has never ran in a challenged election.
