What the results tell us is that Jaguar is following in the footsteps of Trinity and Zambezi. - Aka. Strong integer performance.
However, due to the lack of floating point numbers, I'm assuming it's also going to have the same issue as Trinity and Zambezi, aka. Weak floating point, which makes sense they probably went with the "module" design where 2 cores probably share a floating point unit.
Which isn't as bad as it seems, GPU's are far better suited to floating point anyway, it also helps keep complexity and thus costs down too.
Are you able to pull up any numbers for the AMD E-350/E-450? It would give me an idea how much Jaguar improves over it's older counterpart. (I'm unable to access those links for myself.)
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
