Torillian said:
Seems like a silly distinction to make since so many marriages as they are now are not done for the purpose of procreating. If this were the country's stance then to be fair about its use we would have to ban all people who can't procreate for one reason or another or even those that just don't want to procreate from getting married. |
im not stating that gay people should not have some form of marriage, im stating that they should have one that is different to that of the traditional marriage of a male and female, people always like to jump to conclusions and asume hatred, let me dispell thoughs thought emediatly i do not hate anyone im just stating that the union of marriage between male and female represents two opposites coming together as one and is special for those who belive in this, i feel it should remain so and gay couples form there own variation of marriage thats all, we are different hell every is different anyone who belives otherwise is a lier,







