| kain_kusanagi said: Yes you do have an obligation as a member of the human race to appologize for accidently upsetting a fellow human. Just because you didn't intend to cause pain does not mean that their feelings are less painfull. Talking about 9/11 is perfectly legit. Upsetting someone who lost a loved one and not appologizing for accidently causing the pain would be a dick move. Compassion and empathy are extreamly important parts of human interaction. The internet forgets that far too often. |
So if I started talking about ham sandwhiches and someone started crying (for whatever reason - maybe their family was eaten by savage pigs), I would be obligated to apologize? Or let's say someone become upset becaus my shirt bore a certain shade of red (maybe they were red-green colorblind and my shirt reminded them of their disability), I would also be obligated to apologize? That's the argument you're making with the bolded. Using your argument, you would be apologizing 15, 20 times minimum per day as people are bound to be upset by your words (unless you don't talk much). You would have to apologize to people with the craziest, most vulnerable sensitive topics. Is that how you live your life?
I would guess the answer to that question would be no. You don't go around apologizing to every sensitive person out there just because they are the ones who easily become upset. No, you probably create a spectrum in your mind containing when you are obligated to apologize for something and when you aren't. On one end of the spectrum lies things you probably wouldn't feel obligated to apologize for regardless of who becomes upset (though you may do so anyway to ease the feelings) - like apologizing for wearing a red shirt. On the other end of the spectrum lies things you are more likely to feel obligated to apologize for since it's more understandable for someone to become upset by it - like accidentally driving over someone's pet cat. In this particularly case, yes, it would be a dick move to just casually continue your day after violently ending the life of someone's pet.
I agree that apologizing would be the compassionate move and one that helps ease the tension, but there's nothing morally wrong about it.
