dsgrue3 said:
Lol wow. It's a bit late to say "I don't think marriage should be a state issue", it has been for hundreds of years. Laws don't simply go away because you are opposed to them. Marriage is not a religious term. At one time it was, but since being recognized by law clearly it is not simply a religious matter. It's pretty clear you are avoiding discussing your position rationally and are instead proposing hypotheticals which are impossible. |
My position is hypothetic, yes. I honestly don't have a position for the "realistic" scenario at hand.
And you're right in that marriage is now a state issue instead of a religious one. I'm rather upset by that. With that, I guess with that people can change the definition of marriage to whatever they want because it's at a state level.
I may have read too much into your response, but your belitling and assumptions show me that this debate is going to be fruitless for both of us, so I'll leave my comments as it is.