By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
naruball said:
RazorDragon said:
Price cut and a steady release of games happened in Japan at the same time, it got $200 bundle with Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed in NA and Europe and it still didn't worked. Vita is already in the market for more than 1 year and it hasn't caught on. I don't believe the system can recover from that, it simply doesn't have the appeal otherwise the situation would have changed with the price cuts and game releases like it happened with the 3DS.

That's a somewhat unfair comparison. The 3ds got a huge, permanent price cut early on. Psvita got some good bundles on Black Friday but they weren't permament. Of course they didn't do wonders, as it wasn't a hot item any more. I firmly believe that had it received a price cut ealrly one, it would have had some momentum and would be looking much better than now (speculation, I know). The major difference here is that Niny has tons of money in the bank and thus managed to save 3ds, while sony needs to keep selling building to avoid bankruptcy. 


Mainstream gamers usually don't come to news sites to know if prices lowered permanently or not, so I don't believe that this is what affected Vita's sales when bundles were available. Vita's price cut was also huge: the system itself came costing $50 less with a included $50 game. Also, about the price cut early on, I absolutely agree with you that it would've helped Vita much more than doing it now, but Sony didn't make a well thought decision to release such a powerful handheld at such a low price. Vita has a goddamn 5" OLED screen, that alone shows us they absolutely couldn't lower the price of the handheld or they would have major losses. They probably were/are losing a lot of money making the Vita sell for $250, that's why the Memory Cards are required to run games and priced so high, to cover up the costs of the handheld.