| sales2099 said: Not black and white. Look below the surface. Profitability, past generation performance, time it took to achieve, next generation fully underway in November, people giving a s%&t. Im starting to find the amusment in you clinging to the bare essentials for the sake of your ideals. |
You've expanded the argument to something it isn't. You responded to a post of mine saying that the "bare essentials" as you call them are obsolete, when in fact, they are the only concrete, objective metrics.
| kowenicki said: I'm not spinning. Just clarifying a post with a very relevant fact. One sale is not neccessarily as good as another sale from a business perspective. From a purely units sold persepective it may be. The PS3 would have sold more if it had launched at a lower price, yes? Also, if they hadnt cut the price when they did, and sustained large losses, they would have sold less. Its very simple. |
Okay, but I'm not arguing this. I'm not sure if you've followed but this guy was the one who I responded to:
| mii-gamer said: It's like awarding sony the gold medal for crossing the finish lines. While competitors have already finished the race long time ago and readying themselves for the next competition, Sony just scrapes over to finish the race. Congratulations |
I simply said his logic was bunk. sales2099 tried to use subjective arguments to refute the objective proof that mii-gamer's logic was bunk.
