BenKenobi88 said: zerosaurus said: Is it just me or am I the only one that thinks that the original trilogy isn't all it's cracked up to be. I mean it's like an oreo cookie with a shit filling in the middle. The trilogy is essentially two good movies eight years apart and a movie in between that makes you wonder "why did they film this?". It still beats the Matrix trilogy which is one good (though poorly acted) film followed by two hernias. |
Then just ignore the movie...Raiders and especially The Last Crusade are amazing...I never watch Temple of Doom...I've probably only seen that movie once and a half. |
The problem is that the Temple of Doom is a member of the trilogy, so I can't just ignore it.
Are Nazi's the recipe of success for the IJ series? Because cannibals really didn't do it for me.