richardhutnik said:
That bit of evidence have family members denying he was some sort of terrorist. And, it is IMMENSELY offensive for you to end up doing this... Devout Muslim = terrorist. If your thinking is that, you are guilt of stereotyping AT THE LEAST. And you saying you aren't saying it. Because you don't wait on things, you are saying it, and imply that devout Muslim means terrorist. Not that all terrorists are devout Muslims, but if the person is a devout Muslim OBVIOUSLY they would be a terrorist. To say this would be akin to saying Fundamentalist Christians who are opposed to abortion, are abortion clinic bombers. |
Whoa, that's really not what Badgenome's saying. He's saying that the likelihood that this was motivated by religion is because they were following patterns that other Jihadists have followed, namely that a sudden spike in religious devotion is a potential sign of radicalization, but not necessarily meaning that even all devout muslims have been radicalized, at all.
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.