| outlawauron said: No, you're twisting my words. John and Matthew tell the same story from different prespectives. Both are about the life and teachings of Jesus, not about the visions of end times that were written while John was exiled. I never tied them together, but because I included who wrote it, you think it matters. I hold all four gospels of equal importance, and the utmost when talking about Jesus. |
Okay, so you were tying Revelation to John, not the book of John. I understand. May I ask why you hold the Book of John in higher esteem than Revelation?
Just from basic research, there are 3 books dated around 60 CE - Mark, Matthew, Luke.
Then 30 years after that, John and Revelation around 90 CE.
To me, it seems a bit strange to hold Matthew in the same regard as Mark/Matthew/Luke.
