zerosaurus on 20 February 2008
Is it just me or am I the only one that thinks that the original trilogy isn't all it's cracked up to be. I mean it's like an oreo cookie with a shit filling in the middle. The trilogy is essentially two good movies eight years apart and a movie in between that makes you wonder "why did they film this?".
It still beats the Matrix trilogy which is one good (though poorly acted) film followed by two hernias.
