| JSF said: Technical specs cannot be exaggerated, unless you're talking outright fraud. Either you have a 1.8Ghz Core Duo or you don't...that sort of thing. Marketing can be exaggerated. BTW, has it occurred to you that the "weakest console" is also usually the cheapest to make? Quick math test: which side of this equation is greater? 256 + 256 = 512 Hey, you know what? You spent a whole paragraph arguing how PS1 and PS2 memory were always undersized versus their competitors', but those consoles also happened to be the market winners of their generations. Shouldn't your fact then be that the console with the least RAM wins?
|
Who ever denied the weakest console was the cheapest to produce? This is one reason for fast production and mass adoption.
And My argument about PS3 Memory and Xbox360 had nothing to do with market sales, but one true comparison rather than abstract comparison between CPU and GPUs. And Nowhere I claimed Xbox360 to win but its the Wii, with the least memory again, which is gonna win! :)
Playstation 5 vs XBox Series Market Share Estimates
Regional Analysis (only MS and Sony Consoles)
Europe => XB1 : 23-24 % vs PS4 : 76-77%
N. America => XB1 : 49-52% vs PS4 : 48-51%
Global => XB1 : 32-34% vs PS4 : 66-68%
