| MrMarc said: Oh I have seen the supposed 'ingame' videos and I'm not one bit impressed, I've said this in another thread, it's all too evident how slow and clunky the general movement looks. The enemy models look chunky, like something out of the old Unreal and Quake games, the environments are bland and unoriginal as are the overall visuals. I just can't understand the hype of a game that has a mediocre reputation to begin with whose sequel looks incredibly underwhelming, these kind of things can be seen from videos and I think alot of people have a gamer equivalent of 'Beer Goggles' going on. I'd hate to be that guy who is trolling for the sake of trolling but the hype behind Killzone 2 does quite frankly irk me somewhat. |
I dunno, I downloaded the 1080p video's off the network, and to be honest, it's definitely war-torn, but they're visuals, lighting, and firefights look to be some of the best I've ever seen on a console. I think I saw a total of 1 guy that looked like something even remotely close to unreal creations and that was the Heavy >_>;;; but... he's supposed to be. All the other character models looked pretty good, and I personaly think the animations and motions the game made were smooth as butter lol. The lean and peak mechanics are shaping up very nicely, and if Killzone 1 is anything to judge by, the environments are going to be diverse and plentifull. The only area that might even concern me in the least is the game-play itself, which wasn't horrible to begin with.
From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.
