By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rafux on 17 April 2013
Edit Thread
happydolphin said:
Mazty said:

Right so because the PS1 was better than the SNES, that means we didn't need the PS2 or 3....

The post-Sony conference hype shows that graphics are appealing to many gamers, somthing devs recognise is important to gaming as a whole. 

"In your eyes"....eyes that have never seen cutting edge graphics. Come back when you literally aren't, and I mean this again in the literal sense, so ignorant on the topic. The issue is you are trying to criticise something you have never, ever seen. Ignorance is not an argument. 

If I, having been a gamer since my young age, having been on gaming forums and exposed to threads that compare graphics, if I can't get it, do you expect the masses to?

If I'm ignorant on the matter, then I am just guessing that the market is not much more informed than I am, so sorry.

@bold. Again, diminishing returns. Back then the jump made a big difference. Not as much today, despite all you guys have said this far the differences between games like TLoU and the Killzone demo will only be truly visible to those who know the differences thanks to theory on 3D grahpics, or who are looking at excrutiating detail.

Let's not get ad hominem.


You do realize that the new PS4 tech will not only bring new amazing graphics right? Games like LittleBigPlanet wouldn't have been possible without the PS3, Knack on the PS4 shows some crazy particle effects and physics, showing hundreds of zombies in Dead Rising on X360 was also possible thanks to the new tech, we will see some new things next gen that just can't be possible on current gen.

And for starters Killzone Shadow Fall a launch game looks way better than any previous Killzone on PS3 and at 1080P yes it is 30FPS but Killzone has never been a fast shooter like COD on the other hand not one WiiU game looks dramatically better than its PS360 counterpart.