Netyaroze said:
Very interesting and not at all how I remember it.
Did you read my reply ? Do you have a source that SNES was losing ?
You do realize that losing means that the SNES marketshare shrank at one point.
Genesis came 2 years earlier and build a significant lead before SNES was on the market which is why SEGA sold better.
This is just natural if you play catch up. SNES got more and more marketshare and PS3 even lost Marketshare to 360/Wii at some point, this never happened to the SNES afair. It was behind like PS4/720 are behind to the Wii U now. But if they steadily gain new marketshare once they are released and catch the Wii U years later, would that mean they lost to Wii U at first, and when they catched it down the line they made a comeback ? We certainly have two different ways to define losing. But maybe I just remember it wrong, maybe Sega infact let SNES first build up marketshare which they then lost and later regained.
I feel like I am misunderstanding your posts thats why I want to see the numbers, I looked but I couldn't find a source.
Right now it almosts seems to me that by your definition the PS2 was losing to the Dreamcast and had a comeback when it caught up to its sales.
But if you are right I really wonder how the SNES managed to win that thing by such a big margin in the last years of the Gen. When did the catch up start ? In order to make a comeback you have to lose something first. But SNES never lost anything it had nothing in the first place . It was Nintendos decision that SNES was released 2 years after the competition the System itself never failed it did well from the start and was neither unhealthy (no losses) nor was it ever losing marketshare it once had . I fail to see how the SNES made the greatest comeback if it was objectively in a better position than PS3 was.
|
actually SNES did lose market share. It sold less than NES and SEGA sold significantly more Genesis systems than it did Master systems (the one competing with NES).