richardhutnik said:
So, from a spec standpoint, all that was needed is what the WIi U did, and the developers who demanded as much RAM as the PS4 had, were full of it? This line of reason ends up being: We don't need to go past this current generation, just have the Wii U sit on the high end and code to it, because extra RAM is pointless. |
You say from a spec standpoint....most people don't think about specs at all. If you ask them the specs of their iPhone or Samsung Galaxy S3 or most other gadgets they can't even tell you.
Also there are these little things called return on investment and the point of diminishing returns. Can having more RAM make it possible for the PS4 to have better games than any other console, sure. Does that mean the publisher can afford to write for it and still get a return at $60 a pop per game? Probably not at first if at all.
Are DVD's better than Blue-Rays? Yes. If the DVD is $5 per movie and the Blue-Ray is $50 per movie will most enough people buy the Blue-Ray, probably not. There is a line in there where people will pay for the improvement but only to a point.
People do not write games to please spec-whores. They write them to make a return on their investment. They want to invest $50 million and make $400 million.
You don't get that aiming exclusively for a console that might have 3 million in sales by the end of next Christmas.
Is the WiiU the best console? No. Is it a good enough console? Absolutely.