ethomaz said:
|
Pemalite said:
You forget that whilst consoles can technically run the same games that a high-end PC can, it also does at a massive cost to image quality and framerate.
You get reduced lighting, reduced particles, reduced textures, reduced resolution, reduced texture filtering, reduced shader effects, reduced anti-aliasing, reduced geometry... Heck even reduced map sizes, player counts and A.I enemies in some cases.
Seriously, get your PS3 to play any PS3 game at 7680x1440 and watch it get 1fps or lower, it can't keep up to my PC, neither could the PS4 as that's the point of the PC, to use the better hardware for much better visuals and framerates, otherwise there would be no point to the PC gaming master race.
So yes, while a console can play the same games as the PC, the difference is like comparing a Wii to a PS3 graphically, it can't compete, never has and never will.
Also those percentages are just plucked out of thin air with zero factual backing.
|
What you PC guys did't understand is you can mount the best PC with a HD 7870 and it will never have the performance, graphics or power of a PS4... in any resolution... you will need a way more GPU in raw power terms to begin to get better results than PS4.
So it is like a PS4 ~HD 7860 with 1.8TFLOPS do the same results in performance, resolution and graphics than a HD 7950 with 2.8FLOPS.
Now the consoles uses knows the PS4 GPU will never give us the results, performance and resultion that a HD 7970+ or GTX 670+ can reach in PC.
It is not about raw power... it is about how you use this raw power.
|
We don't put 7870 level graphics in the best PCs....... It wouldn't be considered the best PC then, I mean who the fuck does that? I'll smack his head 1080 degrees!
