fillet said:
The information is freely out there with a quick google if you want to get educated on the ins and outs of it. I'm not arguing here at all, not trying to prove a point or any "I'm right hahahaha" thing. It's just factually correct. The fact Sony have put 8GB in there is a good thing, see my previous post. I'm not slagging off Sony here or trying to downplay their choice - please don't assume this is what it's about - quite the opposite. Can't wait for the PS4 and having 8GB of shared RAM is the best thing I heard at the PS4 announcement a month or so ago and one of the reasons I'll be getting one. I'm just saying that 8GB isn't going to make the graphics better in games, this is not opinion it's straight up how it is :) More RAM does not make games run better and the PS4 has so much that even 4GB is enough for the power of the GPU. Seriously, I could rant on all night but best you google something like "2GB Vs 1GB graphics card performance"...have a little dig around and you will see it's been documented for nigh on 10 years that manufacturers add additional RAM as a selling point - but with no actual speed benefit. In some cases it can even run SLOWER because it might not be the same type of RAM used as the 1GB model of a certain graphics card etc. I'm really not against Sony here so please don't read what I'm saying with a suspcious eye! ;) See the bolded, graphics not better - but easier to develop for, not as much time needed optimizing for developers. |
What you're saying really doesn't apply to the PS4. Especially the underlined part.
I'm not saying the more RAM, the better the graphics. I'm saying the more RAM, the better/bigger/faster EVERYTHING. Why do some open world games have shitty graphics while linear games like Uncharted 3 can push the boundaries of console graphics. In cases like this, I think that the more RAM, the better the graphics.







