JayWood2010 said:
Talal said:
JayWood2010 said:
Talal said:
JayWood2010 said:
MBP has been a great user
Pezus has been a great user
Both of them are biased in ways though. But then again I'd say 90% of the people are on this site.
I do agree that Pezus does turn everything into a positive with Sony but my predictions has been better ;)
It's easier to predict when you can see the whole picture haha
But then again you have users in MSFT's group who also spins everything into being good for MSFT
Lastly I dont think either Pezus or MBP is bad for the site.
|
You're just as biased honestly. You also try to turn anything MS to positive. Anyway just like you said 90% are biased.
|
That is what people think. They ignore my good posts about sony and focus on me defending MSFT and I get that but when i dont agree with MSFT i dont twist things into looking good for them. For example, always online. Horrible idea, simple as that. I doubt they will do it but i will say it how i see it. People ignore that ive never really said anything bad about sony. Just sony fans. Not a fan of MSFT fans either, their is just less of them on this site so i dont say much about them. For me the best users are people like Bananaking and Kain_Kusanagi. They have common sense, very logical, can joke, and they dont take fan wars too serious.
|
True, I didn't give you the credit you deserve, but you are still biased. The latest example I remember is in the Halo 4 online thread. Anyone objective can see how the numbers don't look good, you refused to admit that and defended it. You also made a thread almost the same time about the sales achievement of Halo 4 to try to draw attention from the online numbers.
|
Believe what you want, many people do and I can't say other wise.
I refused to post in his thread and made a new thread to explain things he did not. That is an error on his part and he was obvioulsy seeking fan wars and he got what he wanted. I refuse to participate in it. But saying being in the top 5 is a flop? Hardly. It isn't as popular as Halo 3. then again Halo 3 wasn't going against Call of Duty at the time. I think his thread was ridiculous and shouldn't have been created in the first place in my honest opinion. I love how I'm the one that looks biased when the person who created the thread was the one seeking a war
|
I'm not saying that he was right or that I agree with the way he presented the thread, and calling it a flop might have been too much. Also I do think that the poster of that thread is 100 times more biased than you, but that's not the point the point is that you and most other Halo fans couldn't look at the content which was not good for Halo and instead attacked and refused to accept it. If the next CoD's online players were 50-75% less than the previous one even if it had more competition that time around wouldn't you call the numbers bad?
