bananaking21 said:
gigantor21 said:
bananaking21 said:
this is a rather odd questions to ask consumers. personally i dont care if it were 20 ps2's duct taped together as long as it makes the games it plays now. im extremely happy with the ps3 and i wouldnt change a thing |
What's wrong with the question, exactly? Several developers have said they're happy that the PS4 is easier to work with; Sony itself said they realized the hardware was a problem and sought to rectify it with their next console.
I've thought the hardware set-up was dumb for years, but I've seen several people disagree. I want to see what people think.
|
its because we consumers dont deal with the hardware, we deal with the content. we play the games and use the apps. but i never went like "that damn cell is so hard to deal with!" while using my ps3 because i dont personally deal with it
|
I've seen several games that were clearly inferior to the 360 versions because devs didn't want to deal with the PS3's hardware.
Skyrim was a mess on the PS3; I skipped Bayonetta and Sonic Generations because of how shitty they ran in comparison to the 360 versions (and PC in the case of Sonic). Meanwhile, there are several Capcom games that have issues with lag (DMC, Street Fighter 4, MVC3) that don't occur on the 360 as often. Stuff like that is part of the reason I gravitated towards PC gaming this gen.
This type of thing has had a material impact on my experience with the console, and I'm glad Sony's trying to rectify it next gen.
