Soleron said:
Are you OK with direct breeding? Like if you have a high yield plant and a low yield one and you only take seeds from the high yield one? If not, then why did we ever adopt any technique to improve farming? Why do we need fertiliser? Why do we need irrigation? Are you seriously saying crop yields are good enough and shouldn't improve? Your argument is still coming from, "UGH GM IS UNNATURAL". If it's bad please link the data. |
Yes, we've improved our farming methods but we've never directly changed the DNA of our crops ever before. This is such a new technology that we just don't the effects (good or bad) GM produce will have long term. To just go with it, is a bit risky. And even the ways we farm now aren't perfect. Irrigation uses too much water in some areas, as it conflicts with growing industrial uses. While with fertiliser, why not just use dung?. Just as effective as chemicals but it don't pollute the water or our food. But until we know if GM affects us in any bad ways, i can't agree with it . And one final thing about GM, will we even know what they changed? Food corporations aren't very transparent as it is, do we want them changing the characteristics of our food?
Here is a article~http://rense.com/general86/doct.htm
and heres a video, enjoy!~http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7DqaJ3QgHU
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030







