By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad on 05 April 2013
Edit Thread
Muffin31190 said:
Hynad said:
Muffin31190 said:


so yeah i dont know where you got this chart from but im pretty sure its DEAD WRONG, not trying to start an argument i would just lke to see more evidence of this graph being true cuz yeah nintendo with that much profit especially in the days of the GC and N64 is well yeah not true and sony not having that much profit in the days of the PS1 and PS2, also same with the 360 for microsoft.


If it's not true, care to provide counter evidence?

The profits of the chart do not correlate with companys stock, which in turn would show how well the company is doing. For example if the Company is doing extremely well as the chart says the the stock prices would also rise with the profits.

anyways im not really looking to prove a point but really the evidence is in the stock market and the value of the companys with the years that were mentioned in the graph, with that said I could be wrong but i still believe the chart to be wrong and it brought us way off topic if it really means that much maybe we should start another thread about it.

They do when it comes to Nintendo. Sony and Microsoft's stocks aren't centered around just their gaming devisions, so your point is quite moot. The chart only takes into account the income made from the gaming side of the companies.

You said: " nintendo with that much profit especially in the days of the GC and N64 is well yeah not true and sony not having that much profit in the days of the PS1 and PS2, also same with the 360 for microsoft"

I'm still waiting for you to provide proof about what you say is false in that chart. Nintendo has always been profitable. The Wii U is the first home console they make that is reported to be lost at a slight loss. So, please, support your claims with facts. What isn't true here, and what supports your claims?