outlawauron said:
Marucha said:
NintendoPie said:
Marucha said:
The gay community is largely credited for her fame. They are the people who made her famous, and in a way, I guess that is what keeps her famous (or at least relevant in my eyes). I remember her being somewhat famous (dance music famous which is notable) and then suddenly exploded in popularity... I was a little surprised but I could be wrong about the timing. It's just how it seemed to have went from what I had noticed.
|
I know she is a major beacon with Gay people, so I see what you're saying. But still, I can't imagine her fanbase to be that sensitive over her performing at this Convention.
|
It would be a huge slap in the face if she betrayed "her community" and supported a politics that ultimately hates and wants to make sure that that community can never get married, have equal rights, have a voice etc... I agree that it's probably not going to completely demolish her career, but it would be a huge liability. Even if the community doesn't get pissed off enough, I'm sure the Media would inflate it for the ratings.
|
Oh man, I don't have to read further. I'm curious as to know where you get this perception of reality from. 
|
hmm, read further for what? My grasp? I don't understand, because it seems like to me the nature of perception is that we all don't share the same one. To each his own.
I'm not sure exactly where your comment lies, but if you're referring to my 'depiction' of the Republican party, that is not necessarily my own, that is what the LGBT community will quickly describe the Republican party as. I don't look at the Republican party in an entirely negative light, as I tend to vote Republican on many issues. But... if I were a homosexual or transexual, I would not be happy to be part of a party whose members regularly turn negatively against the group I am apart of. I have yet to know a single member of LGBT community that votes Republican... that's just my experience in the matter.
