Rafux said:
A203D said:
DMC4's problem is that it wasn't a true DMC game at all. In fact thats been the problem with every DMC game since DMC1. There are not true successors to DMC1. DMC4 was possibilly the worst game in the series; it was so far from DMC1 I didn't see anything good left in the series except for combat.
Development time was cut short? What so they still had time to make two hours of cringworthy cutscenes? Which is more than that of DmC.
Cutscenes that involved newcomers Nero and Kyrie in a form of Twilight romance? Cutscenes that involved turning Trish and Lady into Playboy fan service? Cutscenes that involved turning Dante into a riduclously camp cowboy, complete with red cowboy boots?
Maybe if Capcom didn't spend so much time making cutscenes they could've improved the gameplay, which (DMC4) has been completely trumped by Bayonetta. Even DmC isn't as good as Bayonetta, but it still does a lot of things really well. Besides Capcom Japan and Hideaki Itsuno were heavily involved in development, your not just criticising Ninja Theory, your criticising the developers of DMC4. If you knew more than Hideaki Itsuno about DMC, I think we would know about it.
|
Hahahaha nothing of what you wrote made any sense but I do love the way you cry A203D please never stop crying.
|
Nothing I wrote made any sense to you because your a DMC4 fan, not a DMC1 fan. Thats why you accepted all those things. Thats why your against the reboot. All because DMC4 was the first DMC game you played and you find it difficult to understand that Devil May Cry started with Devil May Cry 1 not Devil May Cry 4. Thats why you never question any of the changes that took place. To you they were never changes. Thats why I like the reboot; because I understand that DMC4 was not Ninja Theory's fault. But of course that makes no sense to a DMC4 fan.
