|
Machiavellian said: This is from Eurogamer about confirmation of the Durango leak So the question of the hour is, just how accurate is the information? Based on our communications with the leaker, the data appears genuine - the only real question is how recent it is. The proof presented by the source suggests that the data is at most nine months old: factoring in how long it takes to create a console, the chances are that there will not be many changes implemented since then. That was nine months from the date of the leak which does not sound like recent info. Also, it does not mean that the person leaking the info was wrong and did not understand the information that was given. As I have stated, if VGleaks does not use the proper terms and are using diagrams that represent the structure of a CU array then how can we be sure this information is on the spot. I really do not have any clue if any of this is true or not, my real purpose is to question leaks as people keep throwing them around as if they are facts. The the leaks are wrong, if there is any signficant info that is wrong or can be questioned than you cannot ignore the possibility. When you stated that all of these sites have confirmed the leak as legit, whos to say its not from the SAME source. If the same source is misinformed than where does that leave us. |
The Eurogame part is only the bolded one plus I added the part you forgot.
DF was just confirming what I said here 
.
